From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Still on f90 mode Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:13:48 +0100 Message-ID: <4B6E925C.5030907@alice.it> References: <4B6DF205.4080206@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265539304 15886 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2010 10:41:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:41:44 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 07 11:41:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ne4aC-0002pD-Lk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 11:41:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ne4aB-0003W7-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:41:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ne4a4-0003W2-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:41:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56113 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ne4a3-0003Vu-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:41:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ne4Zx-0003ar-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:41:30 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out30.alice.it ([85.33.2.30]:4129) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ne4Zw-0003Z8-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:41:24 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO02.fbc.local ([192.168.68.196]) by smtp-out30.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:14:05 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B03.fbc.local ([192.168.69.84]) by FBCMMO02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:14:06 +0100 Original-Received: from [87.1.235.20] ([87.1.235.20]) by FBCMCL01B03.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:14:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 In-Reply-To: <4B6DF205.4080206@alice.it> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2010 10:14:05.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[4796BD80:01CAA7DE] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-Greylist: delayed 1632 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at monty-python; Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:41:21 EST X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121008 Archived-At: I have seen that this night there were some changes... Now in interface foo [...] end interface foo function fcn [...] end function fcn 'foo' is in CYAN while 'fcn' is in BLUE. Shouldn't 'foo' be like 'fcn'? Thanks, Angelo. Il 06/02/2010 23.49, Angelo Graziosi ha scritto: > When I re-indent the following code: > > interface foo > [...] > end interface foo > > (for example with the cursor on the last line, 'end interface...', and > TAB; or selecting the interface block and TAB), the last line loses > 'foo', the name of 'interface'. It becomes > > interface foo > [...] > end interface ! <-- after re-indentation > > > This does not happen with 'program/end prog...', 'subroutine/end > sub...', 'function/end func...', which, after re-indentation, *all* > conserve the name in the 'end...' statement. > > Is that to be expected for 'interface'? > > Thanks, > Angelo.