From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:18:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4B45FB29.1030203@swipnet.se> References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <87bphbhxxt.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> <4B448FF5.5060900@gnu.org> <87hbqze39u.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100107134011.GA2381@muc.de> <87wrzuc93h.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262877617 27938 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 15:20:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w5NzY2FyIEZ1ZW50ZXM=?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 16:20:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSu9W-0003lp-IE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:19:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu9W-0000Ts-Vk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu7m-0007nF-Hs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:18:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu7h-0007l5-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59143 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu7g-0007kw-SS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:18:04 -0500 Original-Received: from proxy1.bredband.net ([195.54.101.71]:58013) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSu7g-0003Wt-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:18:04 -0500 Original-Received: from ipb2.telenor.se (195.54.127.165) by proxy1.bredband.net (7.3.140.3) id 4AD3E1C00231948B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:18:02 +0100 X-SMTPAUTH-B2: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqJBADKKRUtV4S1uPGdsb2JhbACBRIIal2kBAQEBN6sRjEuBLIIuVgQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,235,1262559600"; d="scan'208";a="24123449" Original-Received: from c-6e2de155.25-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) ([85.225.45.110]) by ipb2.telenor.se with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2010 16:18:02 +0100 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.2] (gaffa [172.20.199.2]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2367FA07B; Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:18:01 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119586 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman skrev: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:56 PM, =C3=93scar Fuentes wro= te: >=20 >> Sometimes I work on a netbook, which maybe is comparable to your 1.2GH= z >> Athlon on CPU power, and some operations are slow indeed (>20 seconds >> for the log of a file.) I raised this on the Bazaar ml, but most peopl= e >> there think that Bazaar is fast enough and no extensive work is planne= d >> for performance improvements. >=20 >=20 > If that is the case I really wonder what is wrong.=20 With bzr or the bzr developers? :-) A bzr pull for the trunk takes 25-30 seconds when there is nothing to pul= l. CVS took 4-5 seconds in the same case. This is critical, as pulling from= the=20 trunk is done quite often. Other operations are also slow (commit to the= =20 trunk for instance). It is on the edge of usable. Maybe it is bad to compare to git: - Bzr is slow! - Compared to what? - Git. - Well, git is superfast compared to anything, that means bzr is not real= ly slow. Jan D.