From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Status for bug 3233 Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:41:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4B45D65E.9010803@gmail.com> References: <4B44250F.8000401@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262868560 26664 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 12:49:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:49:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 13:49:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSrnZ-0003Ow-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:49:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSrna-0005wB-Jg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:49:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSrfs-0001pG-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSrfo-0001nr-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57198 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSrfo-0001nn-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.221.178]:55218) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSrfo-0001lT-Ge for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so9041514qyk.24 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:41:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c6qWH5dOx/y8GsbttMFg8lmdXdpsitykyXEvYgWZ7Cs=; b=sY4t4lY1BlpAOJ0lrcfW0nWyv2M6UMpHN2+lWpcos5uqBQCSkzCyfIfR2GZdgLZE2G zMVjRk3wtvy820pC6YJ7YDA8SgS8Lrsm1iaPptUgVuEP2C/39q+seMF/c179uPKQv2Wd HQ/JWhRIlZrNlTobYXYHpAJT1tn6I1zRockRE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BkAclSYPkUXBHes+eDj9oer7Q31apinE/8XV/aYP5cD7EyE1x1H99yIYgsyGEoOdDK EaTQn+PgdXY/7XyOSFWw6UYqWoTMvCAmsCF6PdvK+qx3sKSDJt/Tk971avHyitGgbRpN rX8ndTcc1eIqjJ5vfu7PkT6uL0W5P0WDVAHLs= Original-Received: by 10.224.113.87 with SMTP id z23mr5021626qap.58.1262868067220; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:41:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from MobileCat.local (146-115-26-56.c3-0.abr-ubr1.sbo-abr.ma.cable.rcn.com [146.115.26.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm5995827qwe.35.2010.01.07.04.41.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 07 Jan 2010 04:41:06 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <4B44250F.8000401@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119568 Archived-At: I see the patch has been applied to trunk. Thanks a lot! On 1/6/10 12:52 AM, Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I was just wondering what the status for bug 3233 is. I've applied the > patch on my custom build and the problem seems to be fixed. > > Just out of curiosity, I've been following Emacs development for about 6 > months now and I haven't seen many NS port bugs getting fixed except for > a few crasher bugs. Are there anymore of those will be fixed before the > next release in March? > -- Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong