From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-windows-on Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:25:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4AC6378B.5070201@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254504353 8535 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2009 17:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 19:25:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mtlt3-0004qb-Ij for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:25:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33809 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mtlt3-0004Yu-0W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:25:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mtlsw-0004YT-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mtlss-0004X5-9A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:25:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35110 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mtlss-0004X1-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:25:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49252) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mtlsr-00069q-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Oct 2009 17:25:31 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-36-205.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.205]) [62.47.36.205] by mail.gmx.net (mp066) with SMTP; 02 Oct 2009 19:25:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/SIEI9JoHStInwg0oVJydwSYjEfqnci4LBQf06/o TL8nx3gKyVH5ZM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.73 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115854 Archived-At: > 1. Why is this defined in C? Is that needed for performance reasons? If not, why > not move it to Lisp? On my local Emacs I've already moved `delete-window' to window.el and intend to eventually move all window_loop based functions including `delete-windows-on' to window.el too (also because I don't like to call Elisp functions from C). But since this is merely a tedious rewrite operation it has fairly low priority on my list. In any case, there won't be a noticeable performance penalty when moving these functions to Elisp. martin