From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving window handling into lisp Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:13:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4A8A54A3.7080005@gmx.at> References: 4A885D0A.3060805@gmx.at <4A89AA46.6050502@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250583327 25054 80.91.229.12 (18 Aug 2009 08:15:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: grischka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 18 10:15:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MdJqV-0006gH-7T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:15:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdJqU-0006me-G8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdJqP-0006mN-7x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdJqK-0006lb-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:15:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45089 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdJqK-0006lY-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51424) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdJqJ-0004u6-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 07:14:50 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-51-152.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.51.152]) [62.47.51.152] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 18 Aug 2009 09:14:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19wBxccUQlwZ4uB1GcAdqeIL67qPxzKKQ9o8Uz29C 181rIdnTo8zC6+ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <4A89AA46.6050502@gmx.de> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.72 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114359 Archived-At: > Take for example proportional resizing as it is currently. If I make a > frame with two windows side by side, 20 and 70 chars wide and if I maximize > the frame, the window widths are now 63 and 113, and if I un-maximize it > again the widths are now 31 and 59. That clearly is not a problem that > can be solved by ideas, as neat as they may be. It is plain simple broken > math. This means that maximizing a frame increases all windows by the same amount, demaximizing the frame decreases them proportionally. If we use David's approach, then maximizing a frame will increase all windows proportionally too. martin