From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving window handling into lisp Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:07:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4A86DD2E.30105@gmx.at> References: <4A81374E.9050401@gmx.at> <4A8283D8.6070208@gmx.at> <4A83E2ED.2090805@gmx.at> <4A868A1F.4020101@gmx.at> <4A86AD92.7030308@gmx.at> <87vdkpfbeg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250352541 30936 80.91.229.12 (15 Aug 2009 16:09:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 15 18:08:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1McLoK-0001Ut-LG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:08:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1McLoK-0007c2-2q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1McLmq-00072n-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1McLmn-000718-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44250 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1McLmm-00070w-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:56913) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1McLml-00067W-Gd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2009 16:07:13 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-61-34.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.61.34]) [62.47.61.34] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 15 Aug 2009 18:07:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+7+3R7hIe7488lntxpI+4beT/KJarCXlu0Zd7W11 dCTMKou1GpduEV User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87vdkpfbeg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.77 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114272 Archived-At: > I find it saner to refuse the resize request (perfectly valid behavior) > until the frame-internal window configuration allows it. Depends on your mileage. A tiling WM would not be really amused if Emacs refused to resize its frame. martin