From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: point-min and 1 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:16:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4A850F3A.3010005@gmx.at> References: <83vdkvjbet.fsf@gnu.org> <4A813774.1030309@gmx.at> <83tz0ejjm8.fsf@gnu.org> <4A82839E.2010409@gmx.at> <83ljlpj5im.fsf@gnu.org> <4A83E27B.1030802@gmx.at> <4A84568F.7040706@gmx.at> <87ocqjv0dw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250237970 10796 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2009 08:19:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 14 10:19:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mbs0R-0000CY-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:19:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mbs0P-0007Ve-MM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbrxT-00060Q-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:16:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MbrxO-0005w3-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:16:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58972 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MbrxO-0005vy-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:16:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46737) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MbrxN-0000XJ-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:16:14 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2009 07:16:12 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-41-235.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.41.235]) [62.47.41.235] by mail.gmx.net (mp046) with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 09:16:12 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+TRj4bS/2Tfo+hmSG4iHKFpvVtuuQe/NKrcJ6zxU Errxah0P+o3JyR User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <87ocqjv0dw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.73 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114223 Archived-At: >> I'd opt for two new primitives `goto-point-min' and `goto-point-max'. > > And `goto-line-noninteractively' ;) Hmmm.... Every second use of `point-min' is within the idiom (goto-char (point-min)). So I think I have a point here. `forward-line' is mostly used for going to the next or previous line, IIUC. martin