From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Infrastructural complexity. Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:24:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4A682C53.2080307@gmx.at> References: <20090712180623.GA1009@muc.de> <1247798678.6302.156.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <87ocrjtafd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <1247871746.6287.157.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <1247966060.7410.63.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <4A62F7AD.4000609@gmx.at> <87eiscn223.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4A643993.5080302@gmx.at> <87ljmjl9ow.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4A648E1D.1000007@gmx.at> <877hy3l3kj.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4A64BF58.4030001@gmx.at> <871vobkny7.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4A658CD2.8020504@gmx.at> <1248195599.7551.26.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <4A65FA0E.6020800@gmx.at> <1248200131.7551.75.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <4A66E607.9030505@gmx.at> <1248280114.7109.33.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <4A67593D.6020908@gmx.at> <1248289454.7109.47.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248341109 19696 80.91.229.12 (23 Jul 2009 09:25:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, acm@muc.de, drew.adams@oracle.com, Miles Bader To: Thomas Lord Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 23 11:25:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MTuXn-0000W6-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:24:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuXn-000150-34 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuXf-00012c-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuXa-0000tZ-Nv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58397 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuXa-0000t1-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49755) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTuXZ-0005iw-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2009 09:24:40 -0000 Original-Received: from 62-47-35-164.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.35.164]) [62.47.35.164] by mail.gmx.net (mp051) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2009 11:24:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX180ztt+FyI0artrvtepEVbT+0X1Vv6CdnDV+w5S75 oLpOKW0ARgjhq5 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <1248289454.7109.47.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113044 Archived-At: >> If you read my proposal you would know that window groups always form >> rectangles. So even if `window-list' returned only windows within a >> specific group these would add up to a rectangle. > [...] > _______ > | |_| | > | |_| | > |_|_|_| > > Then split the window in the center of > that and from the resulting two leaf windows > form a group. > > Now the non-grouped windows in that frame > fail to add up to a rectangle. > > Did I misunderstand something? Not at all. Only window groups are guaranteed to form rectangles. I never claimed that the remaining windows would add up to a rectangle. And obviously you can't retrieve the remaining windows by calling `window-list'. You can subtract the windows in a window group from the windows returned by `window-list' to get the "remaining" windows. martin