From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nobuyoshi Nakada Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ruby-mode : ruby-mode-set-encoding Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:23:23 +0900 Message-ID: <49adca00.14098e0a.2c79.ffff83d1@mx.google.com> References: <87tz6ak9bq.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236126230 19312 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2009 00:23:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, nobu@ruby-lang.org, Leo To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 04 01:25:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Leeuz-0006xq-6n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:25:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41246 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Leetd-0008Gh-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeetZ-0008F1-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeetY-0008DP-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55392 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LeetY-0008DC-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.168]:18759) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeetY-0005ON-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so3209767wfc.24 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:23:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:sender:date:from :to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=agawod+tBlqQn97p9G3RaFMWa/uoy+FV+S+go8bV4bs=; b=Qna3eFobXhk4LgCcZymbU2Kgv9POJoSuTHQJMjD/ZTnM7CzfZc+NLa0VV3Q6xJfUwb CjwlaZB4Np69uaAd+JdsUdy843JYDc52cndeikhy93zxExOO4sl6I7y2XCk+mj8tQLfG PzocHD26O91m+V4HASmJz/czUDkiFhex4TJk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=XnpLmp0Krn0Yy3/oLeIy2iNVouyKwCIOo1R9CsCmWfHqr/9+9Fv0sW24MzaesDokey rTV/Wc/+BJ5CvvfjpWeTNLI8+F4LV4TdtqsUZA8F1z3VErj2GWA9ghDiKcgdVkuKN+OC uJPf/Oxwngn10ENNXPITWCq4Ucy4AjUUh45cw= Original-Received: by 10.142.12.14 with SMTP id 14mr3876981wfl.120.1236126209454; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:23:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from sharui.kanuma.tochigi (202-127-187-186.users.bc9.ne.jp [202.127.187.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm5601083wfi.32.2009.03.03.16.23.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:23:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109427 Archived-At: Hi, At Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:30:51 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I don't know if it's too intrusive, but it seems unrelated to Ruby. > Nobuyoshi Nakada, looking at the history of ruby-mode.el at > http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/trunk/misc, it appears the change is > due to you, could you explain what this is intended to do? > If it's not specific to Ruby, then maybe it should be moved elsewhere. It's mandatory for Ruby 1.9 or later. Ruby 1.9 needs that "magic comment" to know in what encoding a script is written. Otherwise, the script is assumed as written with ASCII 7bit characters only, and non-ASCII character causes an exception if exists. Could you elaborate the problem? -- Nobu Nakada