From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fail on osx between 2/4/2009 and 2/5/2009 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:06:49 +0800 Message-ID: <49917BE9.6020903@gnu.org> References: <861vubqc79.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <10DD5733-4089-4A60-B090-4CB5E32A0E19@42tools.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234271713 25578 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2009 13:15:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Adrian.B.Robert@gmail.com, colding@42tools.com, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 10 14:16:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWsTO-0008KS-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:16:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWsS3-0005j7-Ux for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWsKm-0003uo-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LWsKi-0003u0-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60413 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LWsKi-0003tt-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.190]:61431) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LWsKh-0006Io-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so1995075tid.10 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:07:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5Wn9cU6IJjgt3Gds8yyVQodoHteaW08YerpqojIliTM=; b=nL+1emYg/spGCeJKpHo3sUIvHle+edhV+3EQ6pz1w4zBi3DSZYcyAOv/G1huU4qOCM Fxv4wTffVuTdmqmp3MizI03EF70e6PPHLzz4wQuKJ3pgIZNBasywiMdmLgD+IlPrkI8G AVxkDhNkdCDIA7excZwcqDJ05tGkO8LLne170= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=n/kg35m291adqpTbjAK22rDHRTIeX8WGC7HxeTgmyBc03N67O6Fuxi4qDrq4QyOn0d Q60cEWF8laFV1vr9qHdTi7iUEZxgfIeFsALiecHN8JF1agvCAu2Jp/KoGSXmgTXgYTRg WGMF/fpLMnOxVIKSK7BXIcqFaWGi6uTLYv8x0= Original-Received: by 10.110.52.5 with SMTP id z5mr2715100tiz.7.1234271239802; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:07:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.249.26? ([118.101.26.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4sm1064987tic.16.2009.02.10.05.07.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:07:18 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108958 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa wrote: > Ah! Now I see why the current code doesn't work in > Cocoa/GNUstep port. Hmmm, I'll think about the solution. I > want to treat `mathematical-bold', etc. as a a kind of > script-subgroup, not a script. > That would be better for Windows too. Previously there was a convenient correspondence between the scripts in fontset.el and opentype unicode subranges. Introducing finer granularity in fontset.el makes the job of finding a matching font much harder.