From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Emacs HEAD regressions Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:49:57 +0100 Message-ID: <498964C5.5020906@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233741031 29305 80.91.229.12 (4 Feb 2009 09:50:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sand@blarg.net To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 04 10:51:46 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUeQ1-00061X-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:51:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55132 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUeOi-0003IS-UY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUeOc-0003II-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUeOZ-0003Ht-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58085 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUeOZ-0003Hh-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out26.alice.it ([85.33.2.26]:2488) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUeOZ-00028l-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 04:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO01.fbc.local ([192.168.68.195]) by smtp-out26.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:50:08 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B02.fbc.local ([192.168.69.83]) by FBCMMO01.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:50:03 +0100 Original-Received: from [82.57.144.187] ([82.57.144.187]) by FBCMCL01B02.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:50:02 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2009 09:50:02.0949 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3800F50:01C986AD] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108725 Archived-At: It seems that recently someone [1,2,3] is flagging different problems with a common base: performance. I have tried to reproduce the test case in [3]. In my case, surely I have misinterpreted something because compiling exits abnormally with code 127 BUT... with Emacs CVS <= 20090129 15:40 it takes 2 seconds with current HEAD it takes 11 seconds to exit For the record: changing ONLY the new 'emacs' executable with the older, works just fine. Cheers, Angelo. --- [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-02/msg00162.html [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2009-02/msg00108.html [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-02/msg00226.html