Re: end-of-defun is fubsr.

[Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de>]

Chong Yidong wrote:
> Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 17:09, Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
>>
>>> end-of-defun (in .../lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp.el) is buggy, at least when an
>>> end-of-defun-function has been defined:
>> Is this related to bug#2106? (The title talks about Python, but
>> according to Chong it was a bug in end-of-defun.)
> 
> A while back, Stefan changed end-of-defun, making it do some additional
> movement beyond what end-of-defun-function does.
> 
> 2007-11-26  Stefan Monnier  <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> 
>             * emacs-lisp/lisp.el (end-of-defun): Restructure so that
>             end-of-defun-function is called consistently, even for
>             negative arguments.
> 
> This led to an infloop in python under the circumstances of bug#2106,
> and I made some additional changes to try to prevent such infloops from
> occurring.  But possibly the original, simpler version of end-of-defun
> is better, I don't know.
> 
> 
> 


I have remarked buggy/risky implementation already here

http://www.archivum.info/emacs-devel@gnu.org/2007-11/msg01940.html


Andreas Röhler