From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:53:42 +0000 Message-ID: <496380cc60baa8b4be91@heytings.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> <496380cc60c39dd43419@heytings.org> <496380cc6019a973ad08@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7816"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 17:56:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKl4z-0001sc-Do for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:56:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55102 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKl4y-0001rR-6o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:56:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKl2p-0000Jj-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:53:47 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:57112) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKl2m-0002JM-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:53:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1615568022; bh=TAXzajhxVAlJr/wkGLVmUzV2LsOaL70yk/wklskD/pc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=G5dBsd2R4GtSGpOqnEXq9g9FkcjZoNI7qiXnCHC8IA7wSQEG2OKIFJIysjbR+md9q PxZxtvBv8YYn9KlomeU1QPzS/gvwnUEbmrjmtFBlXN2vMW7LVvEOJFNF4KTaGUm80b LeNzwFBZETlXt7AiRlfOByeSgbh4yD8CFSFqdobZZ6LeMQsx7eQdfzPlXtyuvKSemg peukfNyv2OV/K1PKkoA8I2GWoeKd36MgdIJoikVqDhxgssZm2iDK51RVd0ASzg8+rZ yPydLjisv021Bo3dEi1Zcazm9juRHgKfVlG6nmf8J1hw6NVfOgW7nbwmnA+wJp+8ep A6nOQFBgE3UbA== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266409 Archived-At: >> Indeed, what I proposed would be similar to what exists. But I still >> don't understand: what is the bug when font-lock-mode is disabled in an >> elisp-mode buffer? > > It gives you some part of the code fontified and the rest not, and if > you edit that part that is fontified the fontification will just "stick" > where it is, regardless if it's still valid/relevant. > Now I'm totally puzzled. emacs -Q, "unless", M-., M-x font-lock-mode: the whole buffer is unfontified. What am I missing?