From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:43:34 +0000 Message-ID: <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <831rclmoy0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgz9l9xw.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eb516fc37ed@heytings.org> <83wnucltxe.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc602598836e8f@heytings.org> <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29078"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 13:45:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhAA-0007Rr-2W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:45:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKhA9-0004jw-27 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKh8l-0003mK-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:56796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKh8j-0003Kj-1x; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:43:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1615553014; bh=Id+6SHHu8RS4jySSDRPWnwIus0eDX1X72gi7hvSmX+U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=hqvjcWO/re0ciUfG+TxtosxudnBmEoHbfDnWDlwaXVqKg9kPJQvtWMyLdZhCJz4kF 6gXldWFGXsAelNrc6JI5M5v6Sz3AfdJc2XYbAyzDl0hzvigcx1b1kJM9aVCFQXvD7S tPZ6d373hY9lxDeurcA5DvNezqSgaCR6XRIqjvRqIAQaabrNxft3qu5Rc5Vs2cGYNc 7aYQui0m1aliTlxqmJOpFtI/uFL+J5CxaLyv5XlnonUR93C+nUbF+COwEJ+lhNg4wc SMclSE3pT4TV6QY8JMuiieMZlIM2XvQHH6Q8Uwism1FPo8yintoHb+rGnQyHohpDLP /AGkQqGMpyJCA== In-Reply-To: <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266390 Archived-At: >>> "M-o M-o" is convenient here because I need to remember only a single >>> command to "fix" any issues with faces, whether it means re-fontify >>> the block or "un-fontify" it. I'm okay with any other command to >>> perform the same duty, as long as its key-binding is convenient to >>> type ("C-x x ..." is less convenient, because it requires me to >>> release the Ctrl key half-way through the sequence). >> >> You can always rebind it to a key you find convenient in your .emacs >> file > > That is true for any key binding, as well as for commands that don't > have a key binding. > > But here we are talking about a command that had a convenient key > binding for ages, so if we move it to an inconvenient key binding, that > is a kind of regression. > I understand that you find the "C-x x f" not as convenient as "M-o M-o", although it seems to me that for a not-often-used command, that binding could be okay, but that's just me. What do you think of the "C-M-|" binding I proposed?