From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:23:43 +0000 Message-ID: <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26273"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 15:33:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKirT-0006il-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:33:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKirS-0007gl-Rc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:33:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKihg-0003dw-Mc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:23:48 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:56922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKihd-0003E7-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:23:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1615559023; bh=7rd8mmm0bwPPdczChFn/qiCSjrmvgCCajju1YBwfPRU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=pCDb4Zobk+XnXXDq6ITx7ErtSXiWiN7ANP8OOhPqFrXOONUUzIVsYrsIh9KOdXzlY dmxLLzEIOnANVTzmiS+YyR0rl4Mvkb1okNGxkqTO3RsDuoPo1sQ3OMXs3uOnZ87zbs DXo8NpYQlQYcnXQuZQPWIJjUEwi+7qjpYSCFgEr7VjgMcxz5AAx9j11ARi3VDCrFEH LQdnil7VI8tiPX9Sb2A7FoQhGw6QFH+GkOpNgL+otWaAK5xCvOiI5Ot9+/qsAM+k58 DLGX0E5SZ0SBASPkLxDzEWho3hS1xiM5++3o6YQp2KDtufRl/P3m/AHLOFh48jqI5R pOhj+2C7dfFUQ== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266399 Archived-At: >>> Indeed (but that one, just like `font-lock-fontify-block`) suffers >>> from a heavy heritage so it's messy and misused, so I'd be very happy >>> to obsolete it (by replacing it with something simpler and that only >>> caters to the relevant cases). >> >> Another question: is font-lock-fontify-region also among the functions >> you'd like to obsolete? > > `font-lock-fontify-region` is an important function internally (it's the > one and only function which performs font-locking, fundamentally), so > no. > Thank you. That was my impression, too, but I wasn't 100% sure. Given this, my updated suggestion is: (defun font-lock-update (&optional arg) (interactive "P") (save-mark-and-excursion (if (not arg) (font-lock-fontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) (font-lock-unfontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) (font-lock-mode 'toggle)))) (global-set-key (kbd "C-x x f") 'font-lock-update)