From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:09:13 +0000 Message-ID: <496380cc6019a973ad08@heytings.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> <496380cc60c39dd43419@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="504"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 17:14:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkQS-000Abh-To for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:14:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40174 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkQR-0001j3-TB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:14:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkLm-0003QN-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:09:18 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:57060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkLk-00071d-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:09:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1615565354; bh=0/gnAYqgWx2VK71Ozaoddg9N6TCViURA3xwa6xp/VIk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=gpAW4pbHxoK8775sQRmLCValSVk+trLltKEbRZxW5rAbgdZTeuwNMwTesnXO5N1kb mV9yrEGcx52HqzbzP4IVp5Vb352EQIcogyrfz7rbYJUVCUi9Nb0DMCPVZAb/0GXJR6 MlXNCDC8SEAA5nMHlAZ/zOqgFvZTaEn3Ca/KnflvVfQBCY5xwpM7nuOBrYC+l4eQkJ /OHCxqnn4mKHXlhx2Uyu6127xvs/p9ewS+a+hxPs4cY13f4mqbiefJ4SrCZQc9tl4p l93dJdG77jv03wd6hULrjuywH+Ou+T2isH6oNWGSwR033Vdombs+0beMj6hTNPe45M /2ZAhhK0YsTNA== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266405 Archived-At: > > That its behavior is defined by its implementation. > > E.g. I find the current behavior to be a bug when font-lock-mode is > disabled in an elisp-mode buffer and your code would be similarly buggy. > Indeed, what I proposed would be similar to what exists. But I still don't understand: what is the bug when font-lock-mode is disabled in an elisp-mode buffer? Do I understand correctly that you would like to keep the current fontification when font-lock-mode is disabled?