From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:50:40 +0000 Message-ID: <496380cc600dd76308a0@heytings.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> <496380cc60c39dd43419@heytings.org> <496380cc6019a973ad08@heytings.org> <496380cc60baa8b4be91@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34783"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 19:51:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKmsr-0008vf-Tl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:51:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKmsq-0008Na-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:51:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKlw1-0007Sg-B8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:57190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKlvv-0003gB-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:50:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1615571440; bh=izKVzPvDoghdmcs9vWcvyROoXTNU70VAJ1iaC2v81k4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=fdN74AAsQqUick8nDEmtMIMmjdrzIQCH+Q2oBTCOA2cYs7EUqtenaXFdSVGrc5s3p GQcrO3+3nPs5tXSSSKq3/LHRfcjld7y9e/8XfGVWAsmm4f1a7R0x0WqUnSn3QPFAbZ j8vmmbO3W6nPjlNwU6ae9aEhwr2m5aTqVadInayb9NU5JlFbGUd8LNXwj5GrIzW/nV KDXqtPBtDY/gnLvtxuWJIOagd2z5tlPyoW3q8+qOWcCJ4qUHkktSNa/+6LbDWxKqUw GPlfxIt4DuPMRwxKoG9VS4WmN35qAVIoKUIvQjERjkKsU4AyC8aD7aJQC5iw0vuu2f qD9vKU9+M0M2g== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266417 Archived-At: >> Now I'm totally puzzled. emacs -Q, "unless", M-., M-x font-lock-mode: >> the whole buffer is unfontified. What am I missing? > > Running font-lock-fontify-block and then edit the now fontified text? > What I proposed was under the assumption that font-lock-fontify-block was (about to be) obsolete(d). But you are correct, I got the condition wrong: (defun font-lock-update (&optional arg) (interactive "P") (save-mark-and-excursion (if (and (not arg) font-lock-mode) (font-lock-fontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) (font-lock-unfontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) (font-lock-mode 'toggle)))) (global-set-key (kbd "C-x x f") 'font-lock-update)