From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Merten Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Please include updated rst.el in 24.1 release (was: Emacs 24.1 release candidate) Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:02:10 +0200 Message-ID: <494.1338631330@eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org> References: <878vg7z57r.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338631346 18503 80.91.229.3 (2 Jun 2012 10:02:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:02:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 02 12:02:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SalA8-0004ws-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:02:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44909 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SalA8-0007hB-2s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SalA5-0007h6-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:02:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SalA2-0006BE-8f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:02:21 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:49890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SalA1-0006Aj-VP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (krsn-4d0b8a95.pool.mediaWays.net [77.11.138.149]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M6AMY-1RmXC11yKQ-00yPag; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:02:15 +0200 Original-Received: by eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B03CEC1666; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:02:10 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32B7C1663 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 12:02:10 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <878vg7z57r.fsf@gnu.org> Comments: In-reply-to Chong Yidong Chong Yidong message dated "Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:20 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.1.1 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:A4M764EG/5w50oqbtMF9S0EeMW0wcCWqZowQ4DwZ69a HTRoNLUY3Ryz2+IcreNLkk5geZengNUnvTRsitT+HbdMrmybrJ 0T3KoqntiMzXLVlW900CE3ePzoyZxownD5aPm7pCc5AyJ6L03c 8G6M5VmSPCQsUp/n2aGolb0lqi8AbV1kbAIVJuwegOc6d5roHC zgK+jzUryR7FLQt84rh9XDKg2uourJwTYvew0XV4rD7lSzLGS9 FxE740sE/hfn4GtvecqgEBW9hWQuMkSlPLrMx1wYFgEtC2o2lR Pa2wexTv30VJR01GkF5knCML07YUPgEeEzWnWFmEZPU7gXQZpj emcv5nz62XDJ131c2XiGBUTZCJHQ9Zjwn7BB6bGfvJJieQp/id rzoFmnky3luFgkikZwY+0g1W/JR0fzVXKI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 212.227.126.171 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150726 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Yesterday Chong Yidong wrote: > If there are no serious > last-minute problems with this release candidate, it will serve as the > actual 24.1 tarball, in about a week. I don't know whether this qualifies as a serious last-minute problem but... > This tarball is made from > revision 108027 on the branch. ...I did the massive update in `list/textmodes/rst.el' from revision 108148 on. Thus I guess they are not included in the release candidate. Since this update really is a (long pending) major improvement: Would it be possible to include it in the release candidate? Gr=FC=DFe Stefan --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBT8nknwnTZgC3zSk5AQJjZwP/S6iRIzdscClcVEzrs+Uopa0L9lA9wcCh Gddz/KxNLj+pQbS+Bu+5q9XyJgqdTNzJpsCqiGZ4IcoqKgS3nVpvO/+9mEXBblR1 91XrV8PaNJsemM8/oEWc/zgWvc5wLN5fVDQE18P0M1rVA7baLc11QaBPw7yekHRv rGiigNSFh0Q= =zXiA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--