From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sparse key maps garbage? Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:05:04 +0200 Message-ID: <48BA9700.9080401@gmail.com> References: <48B9DB4A.5010203@gmail.com> <48BA8BE1.7010006@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220187929 4084 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2008 13:05:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 31 15:06:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZmdE-00061K-0z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:06:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZmcF-0005Tn-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZmcB-0005Ta-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZmcA-0005TI-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45255 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZmcA-0005T6-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:52832) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZmc9-0001kz-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 09:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-87.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.87]:60279 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KZmc7-0001i4-5c; Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:05:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080830-0, 2008-08-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.87 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KZmc7-0001i4-5c. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KZmc7-0001i4-5c c5e83ff664da1d34b9b6d7192d95e3dd X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103314 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > Depends how you define "un define a key". Binding it to nil is such > a way. Binding it to `undefined' is another. Removing the binding from > the keymap is yet another (one that does not come with a ready-to-use > function for it). I am thinking of the last case. Shouldn't there be one for this case? Using exactly the same parameters as define-key (minus the binding)?