From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:21:13 +0200 Message-ID: <48A1D499.5020206@gmail.com> References: <22745878.701461218564286113.JavaMail.www@wwinf4623> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218565293 4308 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 18:21:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: alinsoar@voila.fr Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 20:22:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSyVk-0007S3-HN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:22:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36857 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyUo-0006O5-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyUj-0006N3-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyUi-0006MX-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41380 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSyUi-0006MU-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:40386) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSyUh-0006tc-KF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-151-176.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.151.176]:59521 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KSyUg-0003wr-40; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:21:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <22745878.701461218564286113.JavaMail.www@wwinf4623> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080812-0, 2008-08-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.151.176 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KSyUg-0003wr-40. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1KSyUg-0003wr-40 c8c8b0b68d3e0fa1af5f11b4b26208d6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102356 Archived-At: A Soare wrote: >>> I told you: everything depends of education. >> > No, from my viewpoint emacs is better. >>> But in the same time I realise that from their viewpoint other editors are better. >> > I tolerate their education. >> >> But does not that mean that you say that your education is better? That >> you have learned something that they have not (yet)? > > The word good-best-better is a kind of recursion in nature. Ok, it looked to me that you were trying to say that developing Emacs on windows was useless because of your view. That would be a very egocentric argument and not useful for conclusions about what to do. You have probably explained why it is not useful in a way that I have missed. > If you take care about this definition, the loop dissapears. It reduces to discrimination. If you go on with further this discussion, you make discrimination. Everything is relative to this world. A fish cannot say that he leaves better than a man, and vice versa. > You did not understand. The web site where I have my pretty and most lovely mail account add this banner. Maybe, but what i wanted to say was that you mail program does not work ok. So perhaps it would be best if you used some other mail program.