From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs.c broken by revision 1.435 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:04:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4887022D.6070804@gnu.org> References: <86bq0pf0ko.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216807527 31518 80.91.229.12 (23 Jul 2008 10:05:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tim Van Holder , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 23 12:06:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLbER-00069X-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:06:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48187 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLbDY-0008JO-5K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLbDI-0008Hs-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLbDF-0008Fu-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34977 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLbDF-0008Fc-B4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:04:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]:27707) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KLbD9-0004dz-VM; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:04:44 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 148333341/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$F2S-ACCEPTED/f2s-freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuoFAByfhkhTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBWrBz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,237,1215385200"; d="scan'208";a="148333341" X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2008 11:04:42 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2369; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:04:51 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <86bq0pf0ko.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101299 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > Can we rely on "defined" being available? Seems like an ANSI feature to > me... Maybe nested #ifdef and #if would be safer? I think we already rely on it being available to such an extent that we would have caught any problems with its use by now.