From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs vista build failures Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:05:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4884CFEF.8040404@gmail.com> References: <36366a980807101702r5677d096g8e62ef5b3e278868@mail.gmail.com> <4eb0089f0807111217m66d6cf4el777c197c107ce034@mail.gmail.com> <87skug6tq5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4eb0089f0807111345h13eccdds9b2cf43370b94074@mail.gmail.com> <4eb0089f0807121340x5e26f6dbve03ef50b238f3a3a@mail.gmail.com> <87k5fph5rh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20080713214648.GB1076@muc.de> <20080714195651.GF3445@muc.de> <487C5FA3.4070603@emf.net> <87zloggji9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878wvxxkn6.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ej5oz4pb.fsf@saeurebad.de> <87vdyzxype.fsf@saeurebad.de> <871w1njq32.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87iquzxgtk.fsf@saeurebad.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216663611 435 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2008 18:06:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lord@emf.net, rms@gnu.org, drobinow@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, acm@muc.de, Miles Bader To: Johannes Weiner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 21 20:07:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKzmh-0007vr-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:06:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzlo-0000DB-5U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzll-0000D2-6D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzlj-0000Ce-I2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49891 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KKzlj-0000Cb-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:05:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:46723) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KKzlZ-0007Rp-Hn; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:05:45 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:64409 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KKzlX-00031u-9I; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:05:44 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87iquzxgtk.fsf@saeurebad.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080720-0, 2008-07-20), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1KKzlX-00031u-9I. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1KKzlX-00031u-9I 3ed9f1ce2c5f3164094201bbcfd544aa X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101105 Archived-At: Johannes Weiner wrote: >> Doing so _manually_ (as a shell script or something) is not particularly >> hard if you have simple needs. If you're using some other build tool, >> it should often be fairly straight-forward to use that tool with a thin >> layer on top to implement the GNU configure interface. > > It would be cool to have shell libraries you could use for whipping your > own configure. I.e. no m4 macros but powerful shell functions you can > just call. And once again: If this did not work easily on w32 too it might stop people from using it.