From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Moritz Maxeiner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving point after character when clicking latter half of it Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:48:41 +0200 Message-ID: <4862738.31r3eYUQgx@silef> References: <2255158.iZASKD2KPV@silef> <12248204.O9o76ZdvQC@anduin> <87ilac2kla.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32513"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 22 16:50:20 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qNDw4-0008Hi-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:50:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNDvG-0000iV-Vh; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 10:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNDvF-0000i5-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 10:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from nephos.ucw.sh ([138.201.61.214] helo=mail.ucw.sh) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNDvA-0004MP-BJ; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 10:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ucw.sh (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9329DC51; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:49:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.ucw.sh Original-Received: from mail.ucw.sh ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ucw.sh [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 3bOS44YvCPi1; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:49:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from silef.localnet (p200300d2973a7589c759004f462ccd86.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:d2:973a:7589:c759:4f:462c:cd86]) (Authenticated sender: mm@ucw.sh) by mail.ucw.sh (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 16:49:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87ilac2kla.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=138.201.61.214; envelope-from=mm@ucw.sh; helo=mail.ucw.sh X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308018 Archived-At: On Saturday, 22 July 2023 14:32:01 CEST you wrote: > Moritz Maxeiner writes: > > > Alright, if you feel it's clear that's good enough for me. Thank you for the > > feedback. I assume the next step would be sending the patch to > > bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org ? > > No, that's not necessary (even though we do prefer patches to be sent to > bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org initially.) > > Your patch makes significant changes to more than 15 lines of Emacs > source code; this means we will require copyright assignment to the FSF > before it can be installed. > > Have you assigned copyright to the FSF for changes to Emacs? If not, > Eli can send you the form to get you started. > I know that many years ago I did sign a snail mail form for the FSF, but I don't remember which project it was for, sorry. I'm happy to do that (again) for Emacs, though I do have to point out (and I did that back then as well IIRC) that as a German citizen, my copyright can technically never be assigned no matter what forms I sign [1]. It would, to my understanding, at most count as granting of all-encompassing exclusive usage rights. [1] https://script-ed.org/article/drafting-options-contributor-agreements-free-open-source-software-assignment-nonexclusive-licence-legal-consequences-comparative-analysis-german-law/