From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 432c1aa: Use `pop-to-buffer-same-window' in `project-eshell' Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 22:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <484a46c1-2485-4d9d-e2e4-c45849307b52@yandex.ru> References: <833481ce-5f13-77d5-deef-8d9f0c51cdd4@yandex.ru> <1BE350C3-A516-4752-8997-91C252F7E9AD@thornhill.no> <80a81c94-ebc6-6b07-5aee-81adee0ff33b@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18078"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: Stefan Kangas , =?UTF-8?Q?Simen_Heggest=c3=b8yl?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 21:31:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lNiFn-0004dZ-Bb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 21:31:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNiFm-0004Mw-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNiEN-0003uo-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]:43736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNiEL-00012I-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id l4so15039044ejc.10 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kmg5b/JJ1sEPE9WHZq8l8RPKdC0JAiQZlwimGnoUKjg=; b=rn2p41LKWqRK2rSXmja7YOg7trxKkr+3upbbt5RLb6tcst8aZZdfYYnYxfM5sLNVrC J6EKP5TV/uYEMZxVQQfhmKvqbWckTspx/4eITlnxqRVLqKr286Q10rQHkd9OS6ovJDEC FaTjivK5tBDGBGiBMcpDj9c+jqukzvkPsXmjRumKlv1GYcRQ0upbsmIOZhODX1lhyQD/ 1nwGQUoLjYb1sNmS8shQL8TCYWFHfzcHGpBfJrcPQbwlvaCNts7oxMl9AtS7JZldA5iO zr080ubBRMjv1Q6XJrOASKqZ9SlATXM0RJHW2tfYVYXWydq8sCAANhTpDv/FF+isH1Cr 9GMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kmg5b/JJ1sEPE9WHZq8l8RPKdC0JAiQZlwimGnoUKjg=; b=iVISMy8cyrh3qcuAzmarZMcJDhXKLIGYTfgeum50hO/5v5B4nD1lWuHiD4bTYweRjZ P8W/GK9j+qDkgdO/lWhnZIbiBf4vkZDeFvWqoDzWQiZWRZg5auVC2v9CW8dHCNXvWccV e28PMyvnqde42AFrUAWlv9GZ7lJq4KhvHUejFdN7ST+HlsxwUpAmhEC7mQsn1AfYb+em I2kXDIqzaa9VtZkhNdtFoxKv88QUp3nKdtR6FTHOb0tEpVEKfsWPCo/c07n/QOTU/cTP FWfuLZtmLpYOTol8wPL38Qame/qflZH0VoU8oXqVzgu5W1CUxrTPXKaLED45N6bMF5qi sI0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UVhBT41FSDJjenMCdS9anqhzJqQsw9198O8+j3xrRR1homEMZ +7v7jtvnMnhIhB0g5t9a5Aok8zCF+RE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrzeVVRXBbmEC9i7YoU9ON91nTYe+RAeLtg21va4SnRHOWv/Ni1pcWQkJoI4pHK3BDgdMrxw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f01:: with SMTP id z1mr11642232eji.235.1616272191884; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:29:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id jj15sm6001515ejc.99.2021.03.20.13.29.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:29:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266670 Archived-At: On 20.03.2021 22:21, Theodor Thornhill wrote: >>>>> Should we force one behavior over another? >>>> FWIW, my (moderate) preference is Eshell's behavior because it's also consistent with IELM or Dired. And I use it more. >>>> >>> Yeah, Im inclined to agree, though I dont think we should force it. >> So... use pop-to-buffer-same-window in both cases, then? >> > Sure - all four cases, then? shell, eshell, project-shell and project-eshell? That would be my choice. Unless someone here wants to voice a strong disagreement.