From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; emacs-report-bug fails silently Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:59:52 +0200 Message-ID: <484256F8.5040307@gmail.com> References: <87fxs0hrrv.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <4840084C.2020405@gmail.com> <87d4n3ii41.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <48407716.5080704@gmail.com> <874p8fi9op.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> <87od6lc1bd.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212307221 15196 80.91.229.12 (1 Jun 2008 08:00:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Florian Beck Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 10:01:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K2iUw-0002VI-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:01:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37603 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iUA-0001YO-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iU5-0001Xw-Me for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iU3-0001Wm-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41028 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2iU2-0001WP-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51347) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iU2-0001Ya-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:40358 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iSH-0006xB-9L for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iTt-0001UN-KO for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:39999) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iTt-0001Tt-27 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:59:57 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-59.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.59]:64551 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K2iTr-0006iF-5N; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:59:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87od6lc1bd.fsf@sophokles.streitblatt.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080531-1, 2008-05-31), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.145.59 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1K2iTr-0006iF-5N. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1K2iTr-0006iF-5N fb92f6edb0bdf469ee7b25e1612a3a25 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98169 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22516 Archived-At: Florian Beck wrote: > Reiner Steib writes: > >> On Sat, May 31 2008, Florian Beck wrote: >> >>> Look, if you think my setup is bizzare, please ignore my report. But >>> I don't think it is. >> Me neither, see the sub-thread[1] about this in April on emacs-devel. > > Well, /usr/sbin/sendmail indeed *does* exist on my system, although the > sendmail package is not installed. Confusing, isn't it? Indeed. Is there any easy way to detect from Emacs that parts of what is needed is missing? Perhaps sendmail returns some status or status message?