From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mail that shuld not be sent here Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:08:42 +0100 Message-ID: <484204AA.6090709@gnu.org> References: <20080530165402.GR15311@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080531154612.GA13489@volo.donarmstrong.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212286143 4865 80.91.229.12 (1 Jun 2008 02:09:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:09:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 04:09:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K2d0u-00006v-TQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:09:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2d08-0000rc-SS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 22:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2d04-0000rL-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 22:08:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K2d02-0000r9-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 22:08:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42174 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K2d02-0000r6-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 22:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-5-a-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.4]:24276) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2d02-0001t1-79 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 22:08:46 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 36810615/mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEANahQUhTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBVapd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,572,1204502400"; d="scan'208";a="36810615" X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2008 03:08:45 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EEDBFD for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 03:08:44 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <20080531154612.GA13489@volo.donarmstrong.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98163 Archived-At: Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sat, 31 May 2008, Richard M Stallman wrote: > >> I am sure that is true, but it makes no sense to make a lot of >> people go to this trouble. Sending this mail to bug-gnu-emacs is a >> bad default. >> > > It's a good default, but it may be improper for your project. > The wording of the done messages makes it look like the message is intended only for the developer who closed it. Can we change the wording? It should be just the body of the done mail, the developer will indicate in there that they have dealt with the report, so it shouldn't be necessary to add extra text. And the original report can be looked up if someone following the thread does not remember what it was about.