From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnu Emacs and Vista ASLR feature Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:13:09 +0100 Message-ID: <483E8FC5.6000106@gnu.org> References: <483E84C0.5090708@gnu.org> <86zlq9o0no.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <483B36FA92DD47FFB790AF3B537C78B1@Sparky> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212059629 1705 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2008 11:13:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 29 13:14:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K1g5F-00071y-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 13:14:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1g4U-0004op-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1g4Q-0004oc-Hc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1g4O-0004oI-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46292 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1g4O-0004oE-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:13:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-5-a-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.4]:18216) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1g4H-0005xl-Kr; Thu, 29 May 2008 07:13:13 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 35534135/mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjMFABgtPkhTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBVa16 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,561,1204502400"; d="scan'208";a="35534135" X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 29 May 2008 12:13:12 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8048E3F; Thu, 29 May 2008 12:13:12 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) In-Reply-To: <483B36FA92DD47FFB790AF3B537C78B1@Sparky> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97966 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau wrote: > My point is only the following : I have the feeling that GNU Emacs is > dumping > something that depends on the load base address. Is that true ? I don't think so, all addresses for any Windows program should be relative.