From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 08:32:53 +0200 Message-ID: <48311F15.8000004@gmail.com> References: <87od75kt78.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87mymofip6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878wy8ny36.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87k5hsfdvd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <85y768ug6x.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87fxsff0xc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211178852 18292 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2008 06:34:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 06:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Patrick Drechsler , Miles Bader To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 19 08:34:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JxyxK-00076B-Fh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 08:34:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jxywa-0005xP-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:34:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JxywW-0005wd-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JxywU-0005vA-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57340 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JxywU-0005v4-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35775) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JxywT-00006l-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:46037 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JxyvI-00063l-1P for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:32:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JxywP-00005I-9M for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]:35237) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JxywK-0008VK-9Y; Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63881 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JxywI-0002j7-68; Mon, 19 May 2008 08:33:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87fxsff0xc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080518-1, 2008-05-18), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JxywI-0002j7-68. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JxywI-0002j7-68 3c53718dd2a7d40f8279ddde4083637e X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97378 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22384 Archived-At: Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > I am actually surprised that this is not done right now: I thought we > > had a discussion about having the BOM-encodings early in the automatic > > encoding detections. > > IIRC this is an issue recently reported by Eli, discussed, and ISTR > already fixed by Handa-san. Don't have time to dig it up though. > Something about -le vs -littleendian. Maybe that was done for xml-mode, but not for nxml-mode?