unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>,
	monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Memory leak
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:50:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <482D8332.5030908@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u3aoik2i1.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> With today's CVS on w32, the memory grows by ~900KB with each new
> frame I create, and that memory is not released when the frame and its
> buffer are deleted.
>   


If the leak is coming from the font cache, then I wouldn't expect it to 
be released when the frame is deleted, as the font cache is shared 
between all frames on w32 (and I think between all frames on the same 
display on X). Stefan is seeing 10x the increase as you are on Windows, 
which could be explained by xft loading fonts into Emacs's process 
space, while on Windows the font itself stays in system owned memory, 
and only Emacs's internal info that it associates with the font 
contributes to the growth. That also points to fonts being responsible 
(though circumstantial).

A while ago I noticed w32font_open being called multiple times for the 
same font, so I suspect that we may be overlooking the font cache in 
places and reopening fonts when we could be reusing an existing font.

There is another similar problem when we get text extents - each redraw 
cycle can call w32font_text_extents a number of times for the same 
glyph_string (from compute_glyph_string_overhangs, left_overwriting and 
right_overwriting in quick succession in draw_glyphs, with nested 
compute_overhangs_and_x within some of the if statements that cause 
extra calls for preceding and following glyph_strings if there is 
overhang, which there often is with antialising enabled). Perhaps this 
operation is cheap with the X font backends, but on Windows it is 
expensive (even with caching of metrics), and I suspect this is a major 
cause of the slowdown reported by Windows users.




  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-16 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-15 22:50 Memory leak Stefan Monnier
2008-05-15 23:06 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-16  0:25   ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-05-16  8:35     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-16  9:03       ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-05-16  9:25         ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-16  9:29           ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-05-16  9:46             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-16  9:49             ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-05-16 20:13               ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-16 21:15                 ` [OT, silly] " Thomas Lord
2008-05-16 20:41           ` David Robinow
2008-05-16 21:36             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-05-17  7:10             ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-16  9:43     ` Eli Zaretskii
2008-05-16 12:50       ` Jason Rumney [this message]
2008-05-19  8:05         ` Kenichi Handa
2008-05-19  8:45           ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2008-05-19 11:13             ` Kenichi Handa
2008-05-19 11:59               ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2008-05-23  2:24                 ` Kenichi Handa
2008-05-19 13:34           ` David Hansen
2008-05-19 19:42             ` David Hansen
2008-05-24  2:30         ` calculation of text extents [Re: Memory leak] Kenichi Handa
2008-05-16  2:19   ` Memory leak Stefan Monnier
2008-05-16  0:38 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2008-05-17 15:16 ` Evil Boris
2008-05-17 19:11   ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-17 19:17     ` Eric Hanchrow
2008-05-18 11:26       ` Jan Djärv
2008-05-18 11:29         ` David Kastrup
2008-05-20  6:46           ` Jan Djärv
2008-05-18 13:34         ` Werner LEMBERG
2008-05-20  6:48           ` Jan Djärv
2008-05-19  2:44         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-20  6:50           ` Jan Djärv
2008-05-21  6:10             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2008-05-21 17:32               ` Stefan Monnier
2008-05-23 13:54   ` Evil Boris
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-30 22:39 memory leak Drew Adams
2008-05-31  7:57 ` David Kastrup
2008-05-24 23:02 Memory leak Nick Roberts
2006-04-28 17:51 memory leak Robert J. Chassell
2006-04-28 18:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-04-28 20:25   ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-04-29  1:56 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-29 11:16   ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-04-29 14:06     ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-29 16:41       ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-04-29 17:07         ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-04-29 19:32           ` Robert J. Chassell
2006-04-30  3:03     ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-30  4:15       ` Luc Teirlinck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=482D8332.5030908@gnu.org \
    --to=jasonr@gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
    --cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).