From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Bold screen fonts have been unbolded Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:39:41 +0100 Message-ID: <480477DD.4080702@gnu.org> References: <86ej97o43e.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208252429 22864 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 09:40:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 11:41:02 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jlheu-0003V4-S3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:41:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlheG-0003wq-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlhe8-0003uY-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlhe6-0003rb-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlhe6-0003rF-GT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlhe6-0002mT-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlhe5-00088E-Q7 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlhe2-0002lW-86 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlhdy-0002kH-2Y; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:40:02 -0400 Original-X-Trace: 95913361/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAJIUBEhTQxds/2dsb2JhbACBXqpv X-IP-Direction: IN Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO wanchan.jasonrumney.net) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2008 10:40:01 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.249.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [192.168.249.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDE149; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:40:04 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: <86ej97o43e.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=8086879D X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95254 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22026 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > This is pretty weird: I don't replace my Emacs that often, so I am not > sure when this started: some place in the last months. The effect I see > is that bold (and strong-colored) fonts don't appear bold or > strong-colored but with normal stroke width and somewhat dulled. > Is this the first version you've installed that has had the new font backend enabled? There appear to be various problems with italic and bold variations in the new font backend. The momentary proper display while dragging the window may be because of a bug where the old font code is called in some circumstances.