From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:03:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4803D494.3080900@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480208C8.3030401@gnu.org> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> <4802FD64.1080602@gmail.com> <48038487.3060201@gmail.com> <4803BA8B.9060301@gnu.org> <4803BFB3.4080104@gmail.com> <4803CEFF.9020707@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208210781 26771 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 22:06:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 00:06:54 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlWon-0002Z2-MX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:06:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWne-0004kx-9H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWnb-0004kr-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:05:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWnV-0004kO-M2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlWnV-0004kL-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlWm5-0004I4-2J; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:61961 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JlWlc-0001jQ-8s; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:03:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <4803CEFF.9020707@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080414-1, 2008-04-14), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JlWlc-0001jQ-8s. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JlWlc-0001jQ-8s 59a36bfdeef8cd5a3cdcdaca1d9dd87c X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95221 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> Thanks, I did not know about that. Does the shutdown handler take care >> of the WM_QUERYMESSAGE behind the scenes in some way that Emacs can >> ask the user to save data (which the action that message is supposed >> to result in)? > > No, applications are not supposed to ask the user anything during > shutdown if they can possibly avoid it by doing autosaves. See the > previous thread on the subject, and the dire warnings in Microsoft's new > documentation about the changes they made in Vista to avoid the all too > common situation where some mystery program prevents your machine > shutting down by either opening a dialog somewhere where you cannot see > it, or not opening one at all and telling the system not to shut down at > this time. Sorry, forgot they have changed that recommendation.