From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4802FDC3.5040402@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480208C8.3030401@gnu.org> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208155621 11393 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 06:47:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 08:47:38 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlITV-0003uv-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:47:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlISq-0002TQ-Vt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlISl-0002Sr-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlISk-0002S2-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:46:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlISk-0002Ru-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:46:46 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlISW-0002up-Oa; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:46:33 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:64757 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JlIST-00005o-7v; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:46:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080414-0, 2008-04-14), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JlIST-00005o-7v. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JlIST-00005o-7v 74a2177b54b868a339d0501c42f94e9c X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95163 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > >> > You wouldn't: when the WM_CLOSE message is put into the queue, the >> > currently running Elisp code would additionally be interrupted >> > "unconditionally" by setting the quit-flag. >> >> Yes, that's what I think Lennart was suggesting. > > Well, on second thought, no, not really. Lennart was suggesting that > Emacs would *always* be terminated. So after receiving WM_CLOSE, the > current elisp code would be interrupted, normal code associated with > exiting Emacs would be run (kill-emacs-hook, etc.), and that code > would *also* be terminated, in circumstances that Lennart has not yet > fully explained (presumably, with some sort of timer), if necessary. Maybe that is what I did, but that was then a bit unintentionally. ;-) Did not my latest response to you about this make more sense?