From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:10:11 +0200 Message-ID: <480284C3.7050403@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480208C8.3030401@gnu.org> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208124639 8824 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2008 22:10:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 00:11:14 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlAPm-0005Q2-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:11:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlAP7-0007T4-HS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlAP4-0007RZ-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlAP2-0007Ph-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlAP2-0007Pa-Hi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlAOt-0006sV-FU; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63749 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JlAOr-0007B0-75; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:10:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080413-0, 2008-04-13), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JlAOr-0007B0-75. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JlAOr-0007B0-75 747c16fc6dd31f948f7b9ad3119988ff X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95136 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:49:22 +0200 >> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" >> CC: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> jasonr@gnu.org >> >>> Also, an application that is >>> stuck in an unresponsive situation will not react to the click on the >>> [X] button, but will instead cause the OS to display the "program is >>> not responding" dialog. >> If that happens this is a bug in the program. The next step is that >> Windows offers to send a copy of the memory etc to Microsoft. > > No, you misremember. It just suggests to end the program (i.e. kill > it). I am afraid I do not. I just tested to be sure. Windows offers to send a copy to Microsoft. >>> I don't think Emacs should break all these user expectations about GUI >>> program's behavior. >> Hm. You can't mean that users on w32 are used to buggy programs and that >> therefore Emacs also should have a similar bug? ;-) > > I meant what I said; I cannot say it any simpler. > > And this silly thread blew a tiny issue way out of proportion, and > have exhausted itself quite some time ago; time to end it. I think you are simply misunderstanding.