From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:33:49 +0200 Message-ID: <48027C3D.8060507@gmail.com> References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480208C8.3030401@gnu.org> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> <4802756C.6000005@gmail.com> <480277F4.3040500@gmail.com> <851w59qwn5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208122466 2317 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2008 21:34:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jasonr@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 13 23:34:53 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jl9qd-0004Tw-QB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:34:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9pz-00028O-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9pw-00027n-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9pv-00026c-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9pv-00026S-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9pj-0000j0-SM; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63603 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9ph-0003fy-9S; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:33:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <851w59qwn5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080413-0, 2008-04-13), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Jl9ph-0003fy-9S. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1Jl9ph-0003fy-9S b89d773f9753eff4051bf345ad26e594 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95133 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >> Juanma Barranquero wrote: >>> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) >>> wrote: >>> >>>> By recognizing that it has recieved WM_CLOSE. I tried to say that this >>>> should be handled as a kind of "quit" in those cases. >>> Why should clicking into the [X] box interrupt useful work without >>> asking? >> It is the user that is clicking the [X]. Maybe there should be a >> question if the the ongoing work should be interrupted though. > > If I have two frames, and start some calc command in one frame, then > click [X] on another frame, I don't want the calculation to stop. If > Emacs can't close the frame "out of processing order" then I'll just > have to wait for the calculation to finish, or stop it manually. But if you have two frames and click [X] then Emacs does not want to exit so this problem should not occur then. (There will be no WM_CLOSE.)