From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Lord Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; M-( and M-) should not be bound in ESC map Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:13:50 -0700 Message-ID: <48000CCE.8010008@emf.net> References: <003801c89a85$fcd95ad0$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> <20080410154940.GB7700@muc.de> <20080410162459.GC7700@muc.de> <47FEF118.5010803@emf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207960428 14376 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2008 00:33:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, rgm@gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 12 02:34:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkTgz-0002DT-20 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:34:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkTgL-00046F-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkTgG-00045r-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JkTgF-000456-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JkTgF-000453-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkTgE-0005Hc-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JkTgE-0003Eh-Hx for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkTgB-0005Gc-0N for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.42inc.com ([205.149.0.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (SSL 3.0:RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JkTg2-0005Ex-K9; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:06 -0400 X-TFF-CGPSA-Version: 1.5 X-TFF-CGPSA-Filter-42inc: Scanned X-42-Virus-Scanned: by 42 Antivirus -- Found to be clean. Original-Received: from [69.236.65.64] (account lord@emf.net HELO [192.168.1.64]) by mail.42inc.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.13) with ESMTPA id 27851429; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:32:53 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95006 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21983 Archived-At: Why is the FSF a union shop? -t Richard Stallman wrote: > Meanwhile, that stuff from O'Reilly is mostly about how to manage a > commercially sponsored "open source" project in such a way as to maximize > your ability to extract gratis labor from the "community". > > Their philosophy and goals are different from ours, but the actual > work of developing software is the same. A lot of the work of open > source supporters about how to develop software is useful for > supporters of free software. The crucial philosophical value of > the free software movement does not concern how we develop Emacs, > but rather the freedom of the users once they get it from us. > > > > >