From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Kyle M. Lee" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs 23 display is problematic Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:56:41 +0800 Message-ID: <47FAD0D9.8060505@gmail.com> References: <000301c8978c$d9b45970$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207619825 6864 80.91.229.12 (8 Apr 2008 01:57:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 01:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 08 03:57:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jj35a-0004dc-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:57:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jj34x-0001U9-De for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jj34t-0001Tu-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jj34s-0001Ti-9t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jj34s-0001Tf-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jj34r-0007Lh-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so1798858wff.24 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:56:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2bg0zM8H6FYsJjniSmhXFqLOMcUwRSGuQJ8i9K8vWt4=; b=H2BbNhXlAiP2LLF+xacw9Mji7AJn6Z2kg25BRU4j0GnDsF864zSvnB1dGxnNIPP0t3VDpasAe4QUOjNzW0I6yEWI3TE7MYpjXvbZqUKAoujeGFyl3i1fMlu7M6OHpicXDv15d5lCCNYeZOJy/XJAlrp+nSAj/XIreinD04NZ8c0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pjFcZx34CuepMmyQ1ExNPfj33jVmEA9jY1vdQeHx5kA7AbKp8wi5nYJsK+xgiTO2590cX7S/3WjaZTZcYIye7ZyhCGa+xKZ4zCyx8vGtEaNEYXFCHqeOd7w5GJQNR3bM4v3oDppzE02sjKURYQuHY2pfzEitjx3bq6ITu5fvsJw= Original-Received: by 10.142.172.12 with SMTP id u12mr2966308wfe.19.1207619809142; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?127.0.0.1? ( [121.15.37.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm812151wfa.13.2008.04.07.18.56.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:56:48 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: <000301c8978c$d9b45970$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94658 Archived-At: Drew Adams 写道: > I hate to say it, but my experience so far with Emacs 23 is disappointing. The > display seems, well, f***ed up. Frames that are not the last one displayed go > blank or partially blank (even the selected frame, if not the last displayed); > the scroll bar sometimes turns into only a narrow sliver; frames flash when I > scroll; frame colors and other parameters are not correct; and so on. > > Besides display problems (or maybe it's also related to display - dunno), Emacs > 23 is v e r y slow in general. I added arg to the shortcut of runemacs.exe, something like "D:\apps\emacs\bin\runemacs.exe --disable-font-backend". It will run faster. This is from the previous maillist discussion. And I tried to compile cvs emacs by using mingw-gcc with "extreme" optimized options. It's seemed will break the emacs. > > Emacs 22 went through a rough period wrt frames too, so I don't despair - I'm > sure these problems will get ironed out. But it's a bummer that so much has > changed wrt the display of frames. Dunno if this is a Windows-only thing or not. > Anyone else seeing weird stuff like this? The same emacs 23 is much faster on my Ubuntu box than WinXP.