From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Assertion failes in w32uniscribe.c Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:53:54 +0200 Message-ID: <47F6B182.9020103@gmail.com> References: <47F4F272.8050204@gnu.org> <47F5E34B.9040207@gnu.org> <47F602F6.2050309@gnu.org> <47F65F16.70904@gmail.com> <47F690C9.7030603@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207349660 16642 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2008 22:54:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Claus , Emacs Devel To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 05 00:54:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jhuo7-00021H-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:54:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JhunV-0003Fr-0Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JhunP-0003CO-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JhunN-00038m-2P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JhunM-00038f-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhunJ-0003Gs-9X; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:59995 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JhunH-0005BY-82; Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:53:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <47F690C9.7030603@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080404-0, 2008-04-04), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JhunH-0005BY-82. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JhunH-0005BY-82 5bc4ebd21ed76233c24fc89f8ec2bea4 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94386 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Claus wrote: >> Confirmed. Lot's of blinking, especially when the screen is split (C-x >> 2). It looks like for each keystroke both buffers are completely >> redisplayed (or parsed... or re-fontified... hard to tell the >> difference). >> >> GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6000) of 2008-03-23 on WindowsVista >> >> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) >> wrote: >> >>> But please notice that this is with my slightly patched version >>> (v 23, >>> 2008-04-03). >>> > > Can you both please try the latest version. I fixed a bug yesterday with > the text extents, which could explain the described behaviour. > It does not seem to flicker for me now, though admittedly I have seen it > in the past. I just did a quick test and I see no flickering now. That is very good, thanks. However moving with up/down arrows is still very slow. If I hold down the up or down arrow the point cursor jumps. (When I use --disable-font-backend it moves more smoothly.)