From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; uid problems on w32 Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:07:42 +0200 Message-ID: <47EEE7DE.3080206@gmail.com> References: <47EEBE03.9030104@gmail.com> <47EEE4D9.9090600@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206839362 1384 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2008 01:09:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 30 03:09:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jfm3Q-0003Kt-QT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:09:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfm2p-0008Bj-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfm1c-0007QJ-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfm1b-0007PK-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jfm1b-0007PA-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfm1a-0002vK-Nj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfm1a-0000S7-Jc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfm1X-0002uW-DY for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfm1T-0002t5-JX; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-150-27.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.150.27]:63441 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Jfm1P-0007CJ-4N; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:07:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <47EEE4D9.9090600@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080329-0, 2008-03-29), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.150.27 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Jfm1P-0007CJ-4N. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1Jfm1P-0007CJ-4N cce10ac78af46d3ff54fa3b6e0c378f1 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93856 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21784 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> I have got at bug report from Thierry Daucourt through >> >> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/EmacsW32 >> >> It looks like this could be a bug in Emacs. The crucial part of that >> bug report are the values investigated at the end of >> `server-ensure-safe-dir' where the user get the following for >> file-attributes and user-id: >> >> attrs (t 1 -14706 513 (18414 17797) (18414 17797) (18414 17797) 0 >> drwxrwxrwx >> nil 34842 (7173 . 33003)) >> nth 2 attrs **-14706** >> user id **50830** > > It appears the directory in question was created by a different user. > Do you have the original report? There may be more information in there. This is what I got at the moment. I have asked for what Windows Explorer shows too. If you want more information please see the web page. >> He also checked with Cygwin which gave other values than the two >> different above for the uid: > > I've got no idea what Cygwin does to emulate posix uids on Windows, so > it is not surprising that it gets different results. I tested with Cygwin on my pc and it looks like expected there. All uid values are equal: (nth 2 attrs), (user-uid) in server-ensure-safe-dir and the output from cygwin id. ls -l shows the same name as cygwin id.