From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Occasional hangs in flyspell-mode and ispell-word Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:27:30 +0100 Message-ID: <47EC1142.6090902@gmail.com> References: <20080327052040.002826434E0@mt-computer.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206653276 19005 80.91.229.12 (27 Mar 2008 21:27:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Markus Triska To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 27 22:28:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jeze6-0004ER-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:28:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JezdV-0002Xx-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JezdQ-0002Xg-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JezdO-0002XH-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JezdN-0002XD-Vn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JezdN-0003lA-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JezdN-0005ie-8T for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JezdK-0003jU-6k for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JezdJ-0003iQ-Nc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:60137 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JezdH-0004uL-5b; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:27:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080327-0, 2008-03-27), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JezdH-0004uL-5b. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JezdH-0004uL-5b 65a3d6054add63d248cd24cc31360379 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93667 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21732 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > I personally use an Emacs patched as follows: > > Index: src/process.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /sources/emacs/emacs/src/process.c,v > retrieving revision 1.538 > diff -u -r1.538 process.c > --- src/process.c 27 Mar 2008 20:52:24 -0000 1.538 > +++ src/process.c 27 Mar 2008 20:52:32 -0000 > @@ -4272,6 +4272,9 @@ > FD_ZERO (&Connecting); > #endif > > + if (time_limit == 0 && wait_proc && !NILP (Vinhibit_quit)) > + error ("Blocking call to accept-process-output with quit inhibited!!"); > + > /* If wait_proc is a process to watch, set wait_channel accordingly. */ > if (wait_proc != NULL) > wait_channel = wait_proc->infd; > > so the accept-process-output refuses to do its job if it's run with > quit-inhibited, which is the typical cause of problems such as the one > you're describing. But your backtrace indicates that inhibit-quit is > (most likely) not set, so your problem seems to be different. It is a bit off topic but why do you not apply this to the CVS sources?