From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: code completion Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:17:34 +0100 Message-ID: <47D8648E.4010100@gmail.com> References: <63pnmnF269411U1@mid.dfncis.de> <87ejafwwir.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> <47D857AC.3040003@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205363879 1326 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 23:17:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tromey@redhat.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 00:18:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZaDJ-00046e-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:18:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaCk-0001gi-NS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaCh-0001gW-36 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaCg-0001gH-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZaCe-0001fl-Ag; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZaCd-0006KN-VT; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:64111 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JZaCc-0007Hg-4o; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:17:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080312-0, 2008-03-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JZaCc-0007Hg-4o. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JZaCc-0007Hg-4o 578a64a640473c83fad158619ef78af9 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92333 gmane.emacs.help:52329 Archived-At: Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Lennart" == Lennart Borgman (gmail) writes: > >>>>> http://www.gccxml.org/ > Pascal> Will parsing of xml be faster in elisp than parsing C? >>> You could always make it emit sexps :-) > > Lennart> Yes, seriously. Maybe those writing gcc-xml could accept it > Lennart> as an option. I guess it should be a very simple change to > Lennart> spit out elisp/lisp instead of xml, or? > > Yeah. Though... XML is important enough nowadays that Emacs really > ought to be able to parse it with good performance. If this means > linking to an XML library written in C, then IMO it would be a good > idea. But parsing xml can't be as fast as just reading elisp code, or? But maybe the speed difference would be negligable, I do not know.