From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: code completion Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:22:36 +0100 Message-ID: <47D857AC.3040003@gmail.com> References: <63pnmnF269411U1@mid.dfncis.de> <87ejafwwir.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205360642 23626 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 22:24:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Emacs Devel To: tromey@redhat.com Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 23:24:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZZN4-0002CR-OW for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:24:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZZMW-0004RX-47 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:23:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZZLW-0003tk-Jo for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:22:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZZLV-0003sO-Q8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:22:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZZLV-0003sC-A4; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZZLU-00042n-TH; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63487 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JZZLT-0002wU-6f; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:22:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080312-0, 2008-03-12), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JZZLT-0002wU-6f. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JZZLT-0002wU-6f a98825e12b3bdf7c8322c9c9f16d7c4f X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:52324 gmane.emacs.devel:92326 Archived-At: Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bourguignon writes: > >>> http://www.gccxml.org/ > > Pascal> Will parsing of xml be faster in elisp than parsing C? > > You could always make it emit sexps :-) Yes, seriously. Maybe those writing gcc-xml could accept it as an option. I guess it should be a very simple change to spit out elisp/lisp instead of xml, or? Is gcc some kind of generic compiler that can handle other languages too? If I do not misremember/misunderstand I think that Eric Ludlam wrote that different parsers could be used by the CEDET/Semantic framework.