From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FW: Minibuf menu when minibuffer is standalone Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:34:21 +0100 Message-ID: <47D6DEBD.8000402@gmail.com> References: <001001c883ab$528a70f0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205264093 1185 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2008 19:34:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Emacs-Devel' To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 20:35:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZAFi-0002aC-5n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:35:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZAF9-0007gP-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:34:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZAF4-0007g6-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZAF1-0007fW-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZAF1-0007fT-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZAF1-0003b3-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:59667 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JZAEz-0005K3-3m; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:34:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <001001c883ab$528a70f0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080311-0, 2008-03-11), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-ACL-Warn: Too high rate of unknown addresses received from you X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JZAEz-0005K3-3m. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JZAEz-0005K3-3m 1eca1d0695b2d16ad5156bbf27c8a3b5 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92181 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > Resending. > > From: Drew Adams Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 8:26 AM > Resending, since the release is now out. > >> From: Drew Adams Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 1:02 PM >> Consider as a possible enhancement somehow making the Minibuf >> menu-bar menu available also when the minibuffer is in a >> standalone frame (frame parameter minibuffer has value `only'). >> >> Because the minibuffer maps are local maps, when you have a >> standalone minibuffer frame, which has no menu-bar, the Minibuf >> menu-bar menu is not available anywhere. (The other frames do >> not have minibuffers, and their buffers do not have the >> minibuffer map as local map.) >> >> Perhaps menu Minibuf could somehow be made to appear in all >> frames that have a menu-bar, whenever the minibuffer is active. >> I'm not sure how that might be implemented, because it is good >> to keep the current situation of the minibuffer maps being >> local to the minibuffer. But if a good implementation could be >> found, it would be desirable to have the Minibuf menu available >> also for users who have a standalone minibuffer. Maybe as a popup menu bound to when the minibuffer is active?