From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Shift-movement selection Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:40:20 +0100 Message-ID: <47D56474.9000300@gmail.com> References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87hcfkdhqk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87d4q8sq9c.fsf@jurta.org> <8763w0n393.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <871w6ounk0.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87ablacdxt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87skyzzeng.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87fxuyobxt.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205167331 11968 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2008 16:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, "Kim F. Storm" , Miles Bader To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 10 17:42:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYl4P-0006eq-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:41:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYl3l-00033e-2o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYl3Z-0002zx-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYl3Y-0002zN-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYl3Y-0002zH-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYl3Q-0008Ew-O7; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:64179 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JYl3G-0008Ik-7I; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:40:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 2008-03-09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JYl3G-0008Ik-7I. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JYl3G-0008Ik-7I d1f018a29e9fb7c23190f05df9c31762 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92056 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > The way I see it, the (un)shift handling would be done in the > `interactive' spec of those commands. Would that be too late? > In which circumstance? But if a user wants to use a particular movement function to extend the region and the interactive spec says that this function shuld deactivate the mark? Or am I misunderstanding? Do you say that only commands that have this particular `interactive' spec should activate/deactivate the mark (depending on whether the shift key was used or not)? In that case I like the suggestion.