From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Indentation contest nxml vs xml-mode Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:41:43 +0100 Message-ID: <47D03AE7.8070408@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204828987 22149 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2008 18:43:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 18:43:07 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 19:43:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXL3R-0001I6-EV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:42:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXL2t-0004LC-S1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:42:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXL2L-0003lW-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:41:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXL2K-0003jg-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:41:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXL2J-0003jU-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:41:47 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXL2J-0005W8-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:41:47 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:60393 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JXL2G-0000sC-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:41:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080306-0, 2008-03-06), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JXL2G-0000sC-6R. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JXL2G-0000sC-6R 6b5a746cab44a5d33ce06f2d68aceee0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91535 Archived-At: Try indenting the following in nxml-mode and xml-mode: Duh I think xml-mode wins here. If I remember correctly there are also some bugs in nxml-mode indentattion code. Is there any reason to have both ways of indenting, ie should not nxml-mode indentation use the xml-mode indentation code?