From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [werner@suse.de: Several problems in KDE/KWin] Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:05:54 +0100 Message-ID: <47C970D2.3020804@swipnet.se> References: <87k5nqqtfv.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87r6hyjbgw.fsf@escher.local.home> <475A641C.4060501@swipnet.se> <87k5npid1l.fsf@escher.local.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204383998 26822 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2008 15:06:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 15:06:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 16:07:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVTIe-0006AO-0O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:06:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVTI6-0004bp-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVTI0-0004bW-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JVTHx-0004b9-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JVTHx-0004b4-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: from av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.185]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVTHw-0002O1-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: by av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C2DB737F8F; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:06:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av12-1-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A618237E66; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:06:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (90-231-102-24-no59.tbcn.telia.com [90.231.102.24]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C6937E43; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 16:06:11 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <87k5npid1l.fsf@escher.local.home> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90993 Archived-At: Stephen Berman skrev: > On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:30:04 +0100 Jan Dj=C3=A4rv = wrote: >=20 >> Stephen Berman skrev: >>> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:08:00 +0100 Andreas Schwab wr= ote: >>> >>>> If you try to maximize a second time the frame is actually truely >>>> maximized. =20 >>> This is so if you maximize either vertically (mouse-2) or horizontall= y >>> (mouse-3) but not for both dimensions simultaneously (mouse-1). >>> >>>> But unmaximizing restores intermediate, nearly maximized >>>> size, not the original one. >>> This behavior has varied in the course of Emacs 22 development. For >>> further details see >>> . >>> >> It is the same root cause as the "describe-{function,variable} shrinks >> frame (GTK+/KDE)" problem >> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-11/msg01108.html). >=20 > I suspected this was the case. >=20 >> I so far figured out that is has to do with wm size hints. Gtk+ >> enforces size hits by itself, and then the window manager also does >> it. There is a race condition in there somewhere, so that Emacs >> resizes itself one time too many. >> >> But I am working on it. >=20 > I am grateful for that and would be glad to help by testing or anything > else I can do. Can you test this again with a fresh checkout from CVS HEAD? I've made changes that should produce a different behaviour. But if it is correct = or not... Sorry for taking so long on this bug. Jan D.