From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug trackers Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:51:42 +0000 Message-ID: <47C489EE.7080909@gnu.org> References: <20080218052546.GK13020@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080218232829.GM5438@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20080219232732.GC18902@jax.donarmstrong.com> <20080221014954.GF23349@rzlab.ucr.edu> <47C47E2A.2080501@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204062722 28450 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2008 21:52:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Don Armstrong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 22:52:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JU7ir-0005d6-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:52:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU7iL-0000JB-A4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU7iF-0000DE-6o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:51:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU7iD-00008q-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU7iD-00008e-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:51:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JU7iD-0002MT-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:51:45 -0500 Original-X-Trace: 49336275/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAFYYxEdTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIrWQ X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Feb 2008 21:51:44 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90537 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > AFAIK the bug-tracker will only know into which discussion to place > a reply if the reply is to a message that comes *from* the bugtracker, > rather than merely being a reply to a message that the bugtracker has > also received (i.e. I don't think debbugs will track Message-Ids in > order to classify incoming replies). > > So people would/will need to subscribe to > emacsbugs@lists.donarmstrong.com and discuss things there, instead of > discussing them on bug-gnu-emacs. > OK, are we only talking about the test period here? Long term, I think we should arrange for the emacs-bug and emacs-pretest-bug aliases to feed into the bug tracker only, and all messages to subscribers should be sent by the bugtracker with whatever identifying information it needs added to the subject line. This will probably take some setting up to get right though, so I can understand not wanting to deal with it now before we've decided that debbugs meets our needs.