From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: m17n, otf0 and configuring on Kubuntu Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:53:13 +0100 Message-ID: <47C419C9.8030004@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204034229 11310 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2008 13:57:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:57:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 14:57:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JU0IX-0001Lw-Js for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:56:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU0I1-000295-RE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU0GE-0001BD-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JU0G7-00017j-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JU0G7-00017f-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:54:15 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out26.alice.it ([85.33.2.26]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JU0G6-0005Ia-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:54:14 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO01.fbc.local ([192.168.68.195]) by smtp-out26.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:53:51 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B07.fbc.local ([192.168.171.45]) by FBCMMO01.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:53:51 +0100 Original-Received: from [87.7.213.108] ([87.7.213.108]) by FBCMCL01B07.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:52:39 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2008 13:52:39.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9FBCF30:01C8787E] X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90504 Archived-At: I have observed that on GNU/Linux Kubuntu 7.10 the result of ${src_dir}/configure --enable-font-backend is [...] checking for libotf... no checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for m17n-flt... no [...] Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt? no Does Emacs use -lotf? no So I have installed (between 23401 packages): libm17n-0, libm17n-dev libotf0, libotf-dev +dep. which is the best I found. But the result is the same: no, no... Could it be caused by the fact that on Kubuntu I find libm17n and not libm17n-flt? Are libm17n and libm17n-flt truly different? or is that only a different name convention? And what for libotf? After installing the packages in /usr/lib I have libotf.so --> libotf.so.0.0.0! (From configure.in it seems that the usage of m17n and otf is on by default, so that one should not use --with-...) What am I missing? Thanks, Angelo.