From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:49:01 +0100 Message-ID: <47B74C3D.5090500@gmail.com> References: <47B165F5.2050801@gmail.com> <47B31BB6.1070407@gmail.com> <47B3238D.7050405@gmail.com> <47B33423.5070909@gmail.com> <47B6D32F.3070705@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203194963 9965 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2008 20:49:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 16 21:49:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQTyh-0000cT-L7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:49:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQTyD-0000AT-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQTy9-00009v-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQTy7-00009i-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQTy7-00009f-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQTy6-0005wo-Ia for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:62089 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JQTy4-0004Oa-9D; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:49:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080215-0, 2008-02-15), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JQTy4-0004Oa-9D. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JQTy4-0004Oa-9D a24b3e7658b7f4b40a77c72962abd76e X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89273 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Feb 16, 2008 1:12 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) > wrote: > >> I still cannot build from a fresh checkout. I get this now: >> >> >> File `quail/lao.elc' does not exist. >> Must remake target `quail/lao.elc'. >> "./../src/oo-spd/i386/emacs.exe" -batch --no-init-file --no-site-file >> --multibyte -f batch-byte-compile quail/lao.el >> Loading c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/uni-name.el (source)... >> >> In toplevel form: >> quail/lao.el:32:1:Error: Symbol's value as variable is void: >> char-table-extra-slot >> make[2]: *** [quail/lao.elc] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `C:/eclean/bld/emacs/leim' >> make[1]: *** [all-other-dirs-gmake] Error 2 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `C:/eclean/bld/emacs/nt' >> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 > > I don't know what's causing this. Do you have uni-name.el checked out > as -kb? (quail/lao.el and the lisp/language/lao* files don't need to > be -kb). Ah, thanks Juanma. It is just so much easier when you are sure it should work. I should have better error checking in my scripts (yes, I added it). I thought I had those checked out as -kb but I did not. Now (for the first time since the merge) the bootstrap went fine. Thanks to all who have been working with the merge! Of course there was something that did not work, but I will take that as a bug report (perhaps, it might be because everything is not ready yet with the merge so I will wait a while).