From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; show-paren-mode causes abnormal vertical lines on Win32. Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:44:38 +0000 Message-ID: <47B607C6.20601@gnu.org> References: <8463wrm4ls.fsf@gmail.com> <47B55785.8030802@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203111901 30160 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2008 21:45:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=3F=3F?= To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 22:45:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQ8N2-0004FN-Ke for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:45:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ8MY-000237-Bm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ8MT-00020M-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ8MR-0001yO-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ8MR-0001yF-L2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ8MR-000564-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ8MR-0006tl-3p for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ8MO-00055a-2U for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ8MN-00055I-Pp for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:44:43 -0500 Original-X-Trace: 7088486/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAADOWtUdTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIrlg X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5231"; a="7088486" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,360,1199664000"; d="scan'208";a="7088486" X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Feb 2008 21:44:42 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89180 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21114 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> If the bug is only in the old font backend, and only in Emacs 23.0.60, then >> it won't be worth fixing. >> > > If that's really how we treat such bugs, then we absolutely need to > make --enable-font-backend the default. > It will be the default before the release of 23.1. And the old code will be removed if I understand correctly, so what point is there in fixing minor bugs in it now?