From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs 23.0.60.1 built today (11th feb 2008) crashes under Vista Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:51:55 +0000 Message-ID: <47B044EB.9010808@gnu.org> References: <47B03F03.2030006@gnu.org> <47B04241.2030308@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202734353 3634 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2008 12:52:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Lilja Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 11 13:52:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOY9E-00070O-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:52:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOY8l-0006fe-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOY8g-0006em-26 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOY8e-0006dW-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOY8d-0006dT-T9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:51:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.32]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOY8d-0005ZR-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:51:59 -0500 Original-X-Trace: 4180944/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/83.67.23.108 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 83.67.23.108 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: jasonr@gnu.org X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAMDTr0dTQxds/2dsb2JhbAAIpzk X-IP-Direction: OUT Original-Received: from i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([83.67.23.108]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 11 Feb 2008 12:51:58 +0000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88741 Archived-At: Eric Lilja wrote: > I just remembered that my build script passes --no-debug during the > configure step. Would it be worthwhile to rebuild without it? Yes. Using --no-debug for a development copy is generally a bad idea. Even for release builds, the savings in size and speed are insignificant on modern hardware.